Pages

Friday, September 30, 2011

Intersectionality - conflicts in the feminist movement

Straight from the headlines, right in time for our introduction to intersectionality. Ever hear of SlutWalk? It's the latest battleground in intersectional arguments in the western feminist movement:

1. An open letter from Black women to the SlutWalk

Black women in the U.S. have worked tirelessly since the 19th century colored women’s clubs to rid society of the sexist/racist vernacular of slut, jezebel, hottentot, mammy, mule, sapphire; to build our sense of selves and redefine what women who look like us represent. Although we vehemently support a woman’s right to wear whatever she wants anytime, anywhere, within the context of a “SlutWalk” we don’t have the privilege to walk through the streets of New York City, Detroit, D.C., Atlanta, Chicago, Miami, L.A. etc., either half-naked or fully clothed self-identifying as “sluts” and think that this will make women safer in our communities an hour later, a month later, or a year later.  Moreover, we are careful not to set a precedent for our young girls by giving them the message that we can self-identify as “sluts” when we’re still working to annihilate the word “ho”, which deriving from the word “hooker” or “whore”, as in “Jezebel whore” was meant to dehumanize.  Lastly, we do not want to encourage our young men, our Black fathers, sons and brothers to reinforce Black women’s identities as “sluts” by normalizing the term on t-shirts, buttons, flyers and pamphlets. 
The personal is political. For us, the problem of trivialized rape and the absence of justice are intertwined with race, gender, sexuality, poverty, immigration and community.  As Black women in America, we are careful not to forget this or we may compromise more than we are able to recover.  Even if only in name, we cannot afford to label ourselves, to claim identity, to chant dehumanizing rhetoric against ourselves in any movement.  We can learn from successful movements like the Civil Rights movement, from Women’s Suffrage, the Black Nationalist and Black Feminist movements that we can make change without resorting to the taking-back of words that were never ours to begin with, but in fact heaved upon us in a process of dehumanization and devaluation. 

2. SlutWalk: It's time to break out the big guns
So those who oppose SlutWalk can do so until they’re blue in face. They can engage in circular arguments and tell us why they think what they have to say is better than what we have to say, and so on. They can even continue to make (sometimes very false) assumptions as to who we are and what SlutWalk stands for. I could really care less. Because, as far as I’m concerned, actions speak louder than words. SlutWalk may not be perfect. But at least we’re out there doing something. And if we have improved even one  person’s life (and I know that we have), I’d say we’re doing something right.

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

Gender in the Media


This looks at gender portrayed in the media: It is interesting how men are usually portrayed as strong and women as vulnerable.

Monday, September 26, 2011

Dual Income Households

Discussing this today, I wanted to provide some data.

The number of dual income households is 54%
compared to single income, husband: 21%.
Single income, wife: 7.1%

Link to census.gov PDF on married couple households.

John Amaechi

This is just something I found while researching my paper. I thought it was interesting, because these straight masculine professional athletes were seen as the most flamboyant to John Amaechi. If you don't know, Amaechi played in the NBA and then came out after his retirement. This is an excerpt from his book, and was put on the cover of ESPN magazine.

Male Clothing Trends

I saw this on Yahoo last night. It is interesting to look at what the supposed trends are for men's clothing, because to me most of these outfits have very feminine features. From stylish scarfs and very tightly fit clothing, to purses for men, this seems to stretch and go outside the gender roles that I am used to seeing.

Sunday, September 25, 2011



Holidays are the perfect time to inundate young girls with the expectation that they should be "sexy."

JC Penneys is the Best!

"I'm too pretty to do homework so my brother has to do it for me." I thought the stereotype was that girls were smarter than boys? At $9.99, this steal is being marketed to girls ages 7-16. This brings me back to the notion that girls shouldn't "worry their pretty heads" about trivial things such as homework. Check out JC Penneys response to this blatant sexism: "JC Penney is committed to being America's destination for great style and great value for the whole family. We agree that the "Too Pretty" shirt does not deliver an appropriate message, and we have immediately discontinued its sale. Our merchandise is intended to appeal to a broad customer base, not to offend them. We would like to apologize to our customers and are taking action to ensure that we continue to uphold the integrity of our merchandise that we have come to expect." Than why sell it in the first place?

Saturday, September 24, 2011

I think guys are getting used to the fact that girls play video games. Girls, however, still think it's a novelty. ^_^

An interesting article on emotional manipulation between men and women.

Friday, September 23, 2011

Men as Women on Cars

An interesting question to ask yourself when trying to analyze gendered social constructions is to ask the question, "what would it look like if we changed the genders in this situation?" Would it matter? In some situations, no. In some situations, drastically. Here's one case where the difference highlights something ridiculous.

Women know your limits

This parody is great to introduce the ideas of "gendered communication" and the use of essentialism to explain difference.

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Campari Commercial

Check out this gender bending ad! I discovered this video about a year ago and I've watched it so many times since. What do you think?

Transexuals in movies


This isn't on our movie list, but I would suggest watching it if you have the time (ha, funny joke). This movie centers around a transsexual protagonist struggling with gender identity, relationships, and a sense of belonging - and there is some great music too! check it out here

The Hanky Code

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Gender stratification in video games

So this is Jacob Bedroske...Birdy is a nickname that I ended up with in high school and kind of stuck among my friends back home. I suppose the assignment of this "cute" nickname to a person such as myself could be a completely separate discussion of gender attributes altogether, but please, just don't ask. >_>

Anyway, I'm a fan of a video series on a webzine: The Escapist, called "The Big Picture" which consists of a movie and games critic rambling on about basically whatever random topic he fancies. This week's episode, while mainly being about video games, seemed to be centered around gender perception and stratification, typically by the geek crowd. I thought it was pretty applicable to what we're studying now.

Also included is a PSA about Twilight. You've been warned.

(gender issue stuff happens from 1:33-3:23 if you want to skip all the geeky stuff)
“Here’s the thing about being a girlie girl. I think there was a generation before us that felt like they needed to act like men to be taken seriously, like they had to use their sexuality to take control of people. I don’t judge people for that. But I don’t want to take all my clothes off and use myself as an object. It’s part of the machine and I don’t think that necessarily pushes us forward as women. I think you can still be girlie and maintain your power. The fact that you associate being girlie with being non-threatening, that is … I mean, I can’t think of more blatant example of playing into exactly the thing that we’re trying to fight against. I can’t be girlie? Why do I need to be defined aesthetically by someone else’s perceptions of what makes me seem like someone who should be taken seriously? I’m going to wear whatever I want to wear, because I’m expressing myself, and I deserve that right. And I like the way that looks. You’re not demeaning yourself by acting girlie. I think the fact that people are associating being girlie with weakness, that needs to be examined. Not me dressing girlie. I don’t think that undermines my power at all.”-

Zooey Deschanel, in an article from New York Magazine.
Here's where I found the previous post. It's actually hilarious. Take a look.



This is pretty funny. As you can see, there's major sexual imagery to appeal to the men.

Run Faster!!! or, The Gendered Social Construction of Sport Unis

From Hoyden about Town, if bikini bottoms and midriffs were really all about the gain in speed
The point?  "Why do women's uniforms differ so drastically from the men? Or rather, why don't the men wear the same type of uniforms as the women?"

Is the answer found in biology? Physiology? Or ideology? Yes, shapes of bodies matter, as do genitalia and secondary sex characteristics (breasts, body hair, etc.), but that shouldn't have such a bearing on a) the exposure of skin and b) the tightness of the clothes.

What would have a bearing on this difference would be if one of the groups involved were considered part of a "sex class," that is, a classification of human beings whose sex and gender category is defined by sexual availability and attractiveness. At least, that's what a radical feminist would say.

The "Natural Attitude"

Our theme for this week, "Beyond Essentialism and "the Natural Attitude," is about questioning the things we take as inherent, essential, natural, as having always existed.

A great question was raised today, "regardless of the theories about sexed bodies, hasn't the fact of human reproduction proven that humans have always been able to classify women and men?"

Short answer, yes and no. Yes, humans have classified bodies according to those who could or could not help one in the reproduction of another human. The key element from this, for our purposes of understanding sex and gender, is: what did this classification mean?

What Harrison was trying to show was that even though one's body was classified as "female" - and this was indeed linked to reproduction - females = those with potential for having a baby - this did not necessarily mean that the body in possession of that reproductive possibility was in myriad ways different from bodies that could fertilize a fertile body, i.e. a male.

It was the double move that came from the initial classification (fertile, fertilizer) to sort bodies into: 1) distinct types of human beings, binary, polar opposites and 2) that these entities carried within them distinct natures, traits, capabilities, and interests.

In short, we went from: body capable of having baby ---> "woman" ---> "woman who is of same nature of man, but less developed" ---> "woman who is the polar opposite of man, a binary opposite" ----> "woman who is the polar opposite of man and has a natural desire to shop, wear pink, and nag"

From classification of fertility we've gotten to classification of whole persons. This classification is buttressed by what Harold Garfinkel called, the "Natural Attitude." These "rules of sex and gender"were the guidelines that Garfinkel saw as defining sex and gender in the eyes of most people in the late 1960s. Are these still the dominant guiding thoughts on sex/gender today? What's changed?
  1. society is populated by two and only two sexes;
  2. the dichotomy of sex is morally legitimate;
  3. everyone counts themselves as a member of one sex or the other;
  4. all members are invariantly (i.e. ‘always have been, and always will be’) either male or female;
  5. the essential identifying ‘insignia’ for males is the possession of a penis and for females a vagina;
  6. people will not wilfully or randomly transfer from one sex status to another; 
  7. in the case of ‘ambiguous’ individuals whose sex status is not immediately obvious, it should still be possible, in principle, to classify them as either male or female (Garfinkel, 1967: 122–8)

Tragedy, again

One of the noxious by-products of a gender system built on the emphasis of binary differences . . . another gay teen suicide. What makes this one tragically ironic? He had recently made a "It Gets Better" video. Sigh.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011


An interesting look at politics, feminism, and religion.

this made me chuckle

Gender Roles in Advertising


I think gender roles in advertising is a fascinating topic. Almost always, images of men show the entire body looking strong, and slightly angry, while women are usually zoomen in upon the face and upper body, and are highly sexual. Here is a site with a collection of advertisements that feature gender roles and stereotypes.

http://www.genderads.com/Gender_Ads.com.html


This picture, from what I believe is a piece of a children's book, makes me think of Lorber's ideas of gender as a system. Especially through stratification and gender as a structure. The girl's roles are centered around pleasing the man. Each role is set with a gender, with the intention of never having the sexes switch roles.

Monday, September 19, 2011

This is a book that I read when I was going through the awkward middle school age. It was great in helping me sort of understand what might go through a guys head and what a guy might be thinking. This novel is about a boy and a girl who end up switching bodies, and not by free choice. It is understanding that comes in the form of comedy.

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Maybe it's not totally relevant, but it mentions gender, and it's Disney. Always good.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSS5dEeMX64

Just so you know I'm not making this stuff up

Bieber wears women's jeans! Ohnoze!
Why is this important? 1) it shows that men obviously are not essentially programmed to prefer one type of clothing over another; but that when 1) is made evident, there will be an inevitable effect, that is: 2) gender is constantly policed.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Would you like some pink with that?

One of the interesting changes in gender coding over the past decade or so has been the "pinkification" of commodities aimed at women and girls. This piggy backs with the rise of "princess" culture among kids as well. Yes, pink and princess have always been with us (or have they?), but the ubiquity is, to some, now overwhelming.

An interesting take from Canada. "What women don’t want: pink beer, pink cars, a new pink ghetto."
The rose beer is part of the pinkification of womanly consumption. It’s now possible to buy pink versions of everything from guitars to the Ford Fiesta. When I went to replace my cellphone, the salesperson led me to a pink BlackBerry and made a Vanna White gesture that said: “Voilà! A phone for the gentler, less technically savvy sex!” Oh, Best Buy clerk, please help me: Which orifice do I hold it up to again?

Monday, September 12, 2011

The Force is with Girls, Too

I think Katie Goldman is awesome to be a Star Wars fan! She picked a role model who resembled herself. There is nothing wrong with that. I am also a Star Wars fan. All I wanted as a little girl growing up were Star Wars Legos. I still have my collection of these Legos today.